1.09.2011

ROMANTICISM

Regions of Romanticism:

French
Jean Dominique Ingres (classical ties)
Theodore Gericault
Eugene Delacroix

German
Runge
Casper David Frienrich

English
John Copnstable
John Mallard William Turner


• Miscellaneous
Goya (difficult to pin into a true style or period)


An explosion of the Romantic Spirit...
Literature, philosophy, music, in addition to the visual arts...
This is the age of musicians such as: Beethoven, Liszt, Paganini, Chopin, Wagner

STYLISTIC CHARACTERISTICS OF ROMANTICISM (in general; regions vary)

Common themes in subject matter:

1) Fantasy - scenes of the imagination, subconscious (dreams / nightmares), magic / the occult

2) Contemporary events (*1st time) - before this time, artists had to rely upon scenes from mythology and / or those pertaining to historical events.


3) Exoticism (scenes, subjects from foreign lands). The "Orient" and lands of foreign to Western Europe became the fascination of the people. The unfamiliarity with customs, peoples, lands, etc. became somewhat of a fascination, obsession, and novelty.

4) Nature - sublime; depictions of nature or creatures of the natural world as powerful and untamed (dominant to humanity). Nature is something to be respected (not an entity we are always able to control).


5) Fear - macabre, awe mixed with terror, violence, and death. All of these were used as elements of excitement in a composition!

6) Various states of mental health

7) Sensuality - Emotional / passionate (feelings, not reason... listen to the heart)

Artistic elements and principles:

8) Movement - dynamic; scenes involving action

9) Application of paint = loose; de-emphasis on line / edges of forms, paint used for paint's sake

10) Textural physical surface

11) Colorful - especially color red (dramatic, violence, passionate)

12) Overall, Romanticism appeals to the individual. These certainly were not intended as moral lessons to the general masses (as found in Neoclassical works).


























1.08.2011

NEOCLASSICISM

 KEY IDEAS 

The Rococo style was replaced by the Neoclassical style, which was perceived as more democratic.
Neo = new
Classical = refers to the works of ancient Greece and Rome

Industrial Revolution
The late eighteenth century was the age of the Industrial Revolution: new technologies such as cast iron were introduced into architecture, and for the first time it became more economical to work with bronze than marble.

Populations boomed as mass-production, technological innovation, and medical science marched relentlessly forward. The improvements in the quality of life that the Industrial Revolution yielded were often offset by a new slavery to mechanized work and inhumane working conditions.

The Enlightenment
The Enlightenment brought about a rejection of royal and aristocratic authority. A period of intellectual transformation took place, in which philosophers and scientists based their ideas on logic and observation, rather than tradition and folk wisdom.

A deliberate structuring of knowledge...
Denis Diderot (1713-1784) organized and edited a massive 52-volume French encyclopedia in 1764.
Samuel Johnson (1709-1784) composed the first English dictionary single-handedly in 1755.
Jean-Jacques Rousseau discussed how a legitimate government was an expression of the general will in his 1762 Social Contract.

What did these societal changes mean for artists?
Some artists, like Jacques Louis David, were caught up in the turbulent politics of the time and advocated the sweeping societal changes that they thought the French Revolution espoused.

Rome = nexus of inspiration
Rome was the place to be-to see the past. New artistic life was springing up all over Europe, leaving Rome as the custodian of inspiration and tradition, but not of progress.

A HUGE discovery
Italy's seminal position as a cultural cornucopia was magnified in 1748 by the discovery of the buried city of Pompeii. Suddenly genuine Roman works were being dug up daily, and the world could admire an entire ancient city.

Winckelmann's publications
The discovery of Pompeii inspired art theorist Johann Winckelmann (1717-1768) to publish The History of Ancient Art in 1764, which many consider the first art history book. Winckelmann heavily criticized the waning Rococo as decadent, and celebrated the ancients for their purity of form and crispness of execution.


Rise of the Academy Structure
Because of renewed interest· in studying the ancients, art academies began to spring up around Europe and in the United States. Artists were trained in what the academy viewed as the proper classical tradition, part of that training sent many artists to Rome to study works firsthand.

Neoclassical Architecture
Influences: Andrea Palladio (Renaissance architect) and Inigo Jones.

STYLISTIC CHARACTERISTICS OF NEOCLASSICAL ART

• COMPOSITION
-Mathematical, ordered, well-planned.
-Harmony, symmetry and balance of forms; triangular compositional structure used most frequently.

• SUBJECT MATTER
-History paintings (scenes from pre-Republican Rome)
-Even if works of art depict current events or contemporary portraits, there are frequent classical allusions.

Several factors helped shape what artists were including in their work...
1) French Academy
Those deemed 'noble' and acceptable were scenes from classical antiquity... history paintings. 

2) Unearthing of Pompeii
The fact that the entire city of Pompeii was rediscovered at this time invariably contributed to the fact that a) French Academies thrived in the first place, but b) artists began to include, with great frequency, figures relating to classical antiquity (the very land being excavated).

3) Politics
Artists associated with the revolutionary causes in France used pre-Republican Roman subjects as a model through which they amplified their own visions of what they wished to achieve in their own country. The ideals associated with this pre-Republican time were treasured by those who had become disenchanted with the French monarchy's inability to administer fair and just rule in the land.

• INTERPRETATION
Whereas the playful Rococo art maintained a light-hearted quality that, for the most part, lacked true substance, works created in the Neoclassical period drew upon the Enlightenment's charge for imbuing reason, meaning, substance into that which one decides to do. Therefore, all frivolous subject matter, superficiality, and flights of aristocratic fancy were replaced with substantial, purpose-driven themes, individuals, and events... for, this new art was used as a means to bring much more than 'pleasure' to the mere eyes of select individuals, but as a visual catalyst through which the eyes of the entire democracy would transmit to their hearts the underlying 'substance' communicated in the paint... the stuff powerful enough to encourage a revolution.

Stoicism - remaining calm, cool, and collected under extreme emotional pressure
Reason over passion - using one's mind to suppress / control the emotions.
Patriotism - self-sacrifice for the greater good (for the Republic...the people)

• PROPAGANDA
Imagery directed towards the masses in order to influence their opinion for a particular cause.


• OTHER CHARACTERISTICS
-Color is very limited / restrained; the most commonly used color is red.

-Movement is restrained for the most part; figures appear statuesque. The reason for this may be due to the fact that many were drawn from ancient statues, but also because the artists wished to imbue their figures with a sense of immobility.


-Lack of depth; shallow space employed to force the action to the foreground. Many backgrounds are mere backdrops in Neoclassical painting.

-Emphasis on sharp edges; emphasis on line and drawing

-Smooth canvas; lack of physical texture; canvas is smooth as glass (not painterly)

-In general, Neoclassical works of art meant to appeal to the general public, the democracy, the population at large. The idea and importance placed on the specific, the individual was small. The message needed to have universal appeal!

JACQUES LOUIS DAVID

OATH OF THE HORATII

The Oath of the Horatii 1784
David concurred with Enlightenment ideas - moral subjects

Source of subject matter = pre-Republican Rome
a) first recorded by ancient Roman historian Livy
b) Pierre Corneille (1606-1684) - retold this story in a play in Paris

Warring cities of Rome vs Alba

Leaders from each side must chose 3 representatives to battle.

Rome (shown here) chose the Horatius brothers, who were set to fight three sons of the Curatius family from Alba.

One of the female figures on right side is a Horatius sister (Camilla), engaged to one of the Curatius sons.

Another is married to the youngest Horatius brother, but is sister to the Curatius family.

The Horatii swear allegiance to their father, who holds their 3 swords high.

The unswerving composure of the men on the left side contrasts to the anguish and sorrow experienced by their female counterparts.

Message: LOVE vs PATRIOTISM ...of heroic nature
-self-sacrifice for the greater good
-one of duty, for the cause... because it is the 'right thing' to do

The message is reinforced in the COMPOSITIONAL ARRANGEMENT


Composition is organized, rational, triangulation = solidity, immovability

Shallow space forces drama of scene close to viewer (somewhat stage-like)

Light and shadow - intense, employed to create clarity and reinforce intensity of scene

Background - Roman (arches and columns), rather simplified

Figures are simplified, statuesque, rigid

Compare masculine forms (rigid, stable) on left to the feminine forms on right (softer, curvilinear); reinforcing the emotional contrast of stoicism and anguish.

Painting was a sensation at first exhibition in Paris (1785)

Not really intended as a means to stir revolutionary sentiment, because it was painted in Italy under royal French patronage.

The style seen here would eventually find favor in the revolutionary sentiment brewing in Paris and would invariably find use in stirring such viewers to act upon their ideals. In this vein, such images should be viewed as sheer, unmitigated, unadulterated propaganda - paintings being used to swerve the hearts and minds of the public into believing in a cause.

DEATH OF MARAT

The revolt against the French monarchy in 1789 referred to as the French Revolution was fueled by ideas in the Enlightenment, but the initial causes were due to the economic crisis and clashes of social class.

Social structure:
First Estate: Clergy
Second Estate: Nobility
Third Estate: Bourgeoisie, peasantry, and urban / rural workers

Marat was friend to the artist David. The both of them were members of the Jacobins, a radical and militant revolutionary faction representing the Third Estate.

David assumed the role of de facto minister of propaganda - the responsibilities of which included political ceremonies, pageants, and meetings which aroused the public's spirit for change. David knew that the visual arts played a large role in educating the masses and used such images, loaded with revolutionary undertones, to effectively fulfil his position.

This is not a scene from antiquity, but from real life.

Marat suffered from a rare skin disease, which necessitated him spending a great amount of time in a bathtub treatment. So dedicated to the cause of the people, Marat constructed a make-shift desk in order to pursue, even through his suffering state, the work that was needed to bring about the much needed change, fairness, and equality in his country.

Marat was tragically murdered by a member of a rival political faction, Charlotte Corday. She murdered him in cold blood, because she felt his poignant words to be a threat. Marat holds in his left hand a letter, in his right hand - the pen.

The blood-stains are present throughout the composition (towels, letter, tub water, body of Marat), but is most conspicuously present on the butcher knife used to murder Marat. The knife used to murder this man is powerfully juxtaposed in close proximity to the quill that Marat's lifeless hand still grips - the inked quill, the true weapon feared by those opposing the change espoused by such a man... that of ideas, information, truth.

Note the wound in Marat's body, which alludes to the wounds of Christ.

The side table upon which Marat's ink well rests bears the words "A Marat" and "David" - a tribute to both individuals. This inscription, coupled with the fact that it appears very similar to the shape of a tombstone, alludes to the idea of a tribute.

Marat's lifeless pose recall's that of Christ in Michelangelo's Pieta (in St. Peter's). This, therefore basically becomes an altarpiece - for the new "civic religion" of the revolution.

David sheds intense light (both figuratively and physically) upon dead body of Marat with an illumination remeniscent of Caravaggio's tenebrism.

The starkness of the setting forces the viewer to focus on the figure of Marat; nothing else matters (no background or extraneous elements). Delivery of information is of paramount importance... clarity of the essentials and without any risk of confusion.

Recording an event... yes; but much more than that... to evoke sympathies in the public for this martyr.
Death of Marat 1793

Napoleon Bonaparte (1769-1821)
He capitalized on the disarray caused by the French Revolution. He reestablished order for the people, establishing an alternate form of monarchy, with himself as the head.

Served in a commanding capacity for the French army... major campaigns in Italy and Egypt

In 1799 - he became "first consul" of the French Republic (title w/ clear links to the ancient Roman Republic)

For the next 15 years, he used his ambition to gain control of almost the entire continent of Europe.

A big year: 1804
    • became King of Italy
    • Pope journeyed to Paris for his coronation as Emperor of France

A disastrous campaign #1: 1812
Invaded Russia, but ended up in retreat

Disastrous campaign #2: 1815
Suffered a devastating loss at the hands of the British at Waterloo (present day Belgium)

An ugly finale
Napoleon was forced to abdicate the throne
Entered exile on island of St. Helena (South Altantic)
Died on the island 6 years later

Europe after-Napoleon - during the first half of the 19th Century
• Change in political geography
* Changes in technology and economics (Industrial Revolution)
  -Population increasing
  -Rising of the middle class prominence within population
  -Railroads = ease of transportation (people and goods)
  -Industry centered greatly around idea of manufacturing, production, reproduction

*probably the greater factors transforming the continent 

----------------------------------------------

Jacques Louis David: phase 2 (post-Revolution)
After the Revolution, David became painter to Napoleon Bonaparte.

CORONATION OF NAPOLEON

Coronation of Napoleon 1805-1808
How did Napoleon insist upon being represented?

1) Polarization of people in crowd (as seen in the Oath);
  -left side containing members of Napoleon's realm
  -right side comprised of prelates, priests and the Pope (members of the Catholic Church)

Napoleon conscious of the concept of separation of "church and state" and therefore had David structure his composition accordingly.

2) Napoleon also insisted upon having the Pope painted in the act of raising his hand in a gesture of "blessing", as if Napoleon is being religiously acknowledged as divine leader / supreme ruler of Europe.

3) Furthermore, Napoleon chose to have himself represented in the act of crowning his wife, Josephine. Napoleon has just been crowned Emperor of France, and by choosing to have this event represented at the moment immediately afterward (exercising his assumed power), one must assume he wishes the image to underscore his authority.

4) Napoleon's mother, featured prominently in the center of the background, refused to attend this event. However, she miraculously appears in the painted record of this pompous event.

5) Size: the fact that this painting is absolutely huge indicates the perception that Napoleon wished to communicate through this image.

FROM NEOCLASSICISM TO ROMANTICISM

Jacques-Louis David's stature and prominence as an artist and his commitment to classicism attracted numerous students, including Antoine-Jean Gros, Anne-Louis Girodet-Trioson, and Jean-Auguste-Dominique Ingres. Although they were deeply influenced by David, these artists also moved beyond the somewhat structured confines of Neoclassicism in their exploration of the exotic and the erotic and in the use of fictional narratives for the subjects of their paintings.

Napoleon at the Pesthouse at Jaffa
Antoine-Jean Gros's painting of Napoleon at the Pesthouse at Jaffa presents an exalted public image of Napoleon as a compassionate and fearless leader by showing him touching, as if capable of miraculously healing, the sores of a plague victim. The mosque courtyard with its Moorish arcades in the background reveals Gros's fascination with the exoticism of the Near East.






1.07.2011

ROCOCO

The term derives its name from a combination of the two French words...
Rococo = Rocaille + Barocco

rocaille = pebble or shell
barocco =  baroque


Big Concepts / Developments

• Power shift from the royal court to the aristocrats is paralleled in the shift in taste from the Baroque to the Rococo.

• Rococo architecture seeks to unite the arts in a coherent artistic experience.

• A quintessential Rococo painting is the fete galant, which portrays the aristocracy in their leisurely pursuits.

• The Rococo also developed a strong school of satirical painting.

• European conquest of the rest of the world. The cost of maintaining the colonial settlements / territories eventually outweighed the commercial benefits.

• The emergence of the French Royal Academy
The authority emerged here and held considerable influence into the Neoclassical period and beyond...

-A filter through which aspiring artists in France had to pass.

-Education consisting of drawing, painting, sculpting from live models, sculptures (focus being on study of human anatomy

-In addition, concepts of perspective were stressed in the Academy's training regimen.

-Subject matter and style dictated, with artists being subject to great scrutiny w/ regard to creativity.

-Hierarchy of painting types favored:
  1) history painting (inclusion of figure, drapery, landscape, etc. together)
  2) portraiture
  3) landscapes
  4) still life

STYLISTIC CHARACTERISTICS

1) Sophisticated elegance, stylish grace

2) Not uncommon to find references to pebbles or shells in the works of art (hence the name derivative)

3) Curvature, undulating lines and surfaces that swell and contract
There are no straight lines in Rococo art (painting, architecture, interior design, sculpture)

4) Highly eclectic
It is a uniting the arts together into one grand work of art (similar to Baroque style); however, the Rococo is many times overkill and can be referred to as being ostentatious, ornate, or complicated.
Rococo art a living organism, governed by the principle: "More is more",

5) Colors are light (soft pastels); dark tones avoided (compared to earlier Baroque art)

6) Importance of light - avoidance of stained glass in architecture, due to the fact that white light was favored to reveal the soft pastel colors used in the interior art.

7) "Eye candy" for the wealthy and powerful
Titillating subject matter - pleasing to the eye (caters to the senses, not so much the mind). Much of the imagery was commissioned by men who enjoyed viewing sensuously naked women depicted on canvas. The subject matter may often contain titles referencing Greek / Roman mythology, but the salacious manner in which the figures are depicted interfere with a deeper, underlying theme that an artist or patron may have had in mind.

Playful, superficial, light-hearted - in the sense that the subject matter lacked great substance. Many of the scenes depict idyllic 'flights of fancy' experienced by the upper crust of society (royalty, aristocracy).

8) Satirical - humorous on occasion, in that this period marks the first time that artist engaged in poking-fun at societal classes and character 'types' (see William Hogarth's work).

Artists to examine:
Boucher
William Hogarth
Thomas Gainsborough
Sir Joshua Reynolds
Honore Fragonard
Marie Louise Élizabeth Vigée-Lebrun

12.27.2010

Baroque - Dutch territories...er, I mean "Seventeenth-century art of the Dutch Republic"


The title "Dutch Baroque" would be considered a bit of a misnomer, because the term "baroque" refers to the general characteristics inherent in the European art of the 17th Century (see below).

CHARACTERISTICS OF BAROQUE ART - as they apply generally to Europe

1) Was a truly "international style" (Europe, South America, Central America, Far East, etc.) Compare to the Renaissance (which was strictly Italian) and Mannerism (which began in Rome and later picked-up in Germany, England, and France).

2) Subject matter: Historical narrative or Religious scenes

3) Shallow space (compressed to front, "stage-like")

4) Use of drapery; artists (both painters and sculptors alike) enjoyed the effects of drapery in their compositions. It facilitated the drama of scenes and encouraged visual movement throughout the elements of the composition.

5) Sense of illusionism (great space); feeling of ascending upwards, into the heavens.

6) An interest in making one material look like another (example: simulating soft drapery with marble).

7) Heightened motion (scenes involving action). Baroque figures "move"; they are not static.

8) Heightened emotion (theatrical gestures, facial expressions - often times exaggerated)

9) High contrast: intense light and shadow (Chiaroscuro, Tennebrism)

10) Combination of multiple art forms (example: music, theater, painting, architecture, sculpture, etc.) The greatest works are complex works; the more inclusive the materials / art forms = the more "Baroque" a work truly is.

11) Interactive component: Involves the viewer as participant in the work (viewer's presence completes the work of art); many times the figures attempt to engage the viewer (reaching out into our space, addressing via gaze, etc.)

12) The angle(s) / vantage point(s) from which the spectator / viewer appreciates a work is vitally important. For example, Baroque some sculpture was meant to be viewed from multiple angles in order for one to gain the fullest appreciation of it, while others specifically involved one particular vantage point from the viewer (again, whatever the case there exists a factor demanding of the viewer).

13) Purpose: most often, done in the service of the Catholic Church. It glorified and celebrated the Catholic ideals (Saints, miracles, etc.) - and the very religious issues that the Protestant faith despised and detested. Although it would seem that Baroque art (essentially an art of the Counter-Reformation) was a manifestation of the church's pride and entitlement, a deliberate smear campaign to thwart their "because I can" position in the face of the feverishly intolerable Protestant populations, their was a genuine concern for the art's didactic qualities. These images served the church's desire to educate the laity of the glory and grandeur that was promised to those who chose to participate.

13) Scale: usually rather LARGE. Why?

Consider the patronage...
a)  The Catholic Church
b) wealthy Kings
c) autocratic rulers

It was the walls of such large buildings that served as the context for much of the Baroque painting! These barren church and palace walls needed to be filled and what better way to do so than with a HUGE painting!? Because the vast expanse of these architectural structures would easily dwarf modestly-sized work, the need for larger-than-normal work was imperative. It's the "bigger is better" adage for the Baroque...

-------------------------------------------------------------------

If it's not Baroque, don't fix it - so, what's up with the term BAROQUE?

The term "baroque" was coined in the late 18th C / early 19th C by historians, through their efforts to distinguish this later style of European art (which they deemed as lacking, insufficient) from that of the preceding Renaissance (a style which maintained the character and quality satisfactory of their expectations of what 'art' should be). The word "baroque" actually translates to "misshapen pearl". The derogatory implications of this label have since lost their power, but the initial term used to describe this art has remained.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

A bad classification?

The problem with this classification for the Dutch territories at this time, however, is that Dutch art of the North was, by and large, Protestant (Calvinist) in nature; whereas the Dutch territories lying to the South (Flanders) remained ardent in their Catholic faith. While there are always exceptions and subtle cross-over between the two, it is this very difference in religious faith that caused the work produced in the Seventeenth Century to appear extremely different -- in subject, patronage, style, and purpose -- despite the fact that the North and South Dutch regions existed in close proximity to one another.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

The North v. South...   in search of appropriate labels

Therefore, the more appropriate title for the work produced in the northern centers such as Delft, Amsterdam, Leiden, and Haarlem at this time would be that from the "Dutch Republic". This region is also referred to as the United Providences of the Netherlands and corresponds to the present day area of Holland.

The southern Dutch provinces remained under Spanish control, and therefore remained Catholic. This area is accurately referred to as Flanders. Major centers of the Flemish south were Antwerp and Brussels. Today, this area roughly corresponds to Belgium.

Map of 17 C Europe
------------------------------------------------------------------- 


 DUTCH REPUBLIC - different pictorial subjects, styles, and patronage

So... as you recall from the discussion about the Protestant Reformation and the ensuing Counter Reformation, the Protestant faith forbade art of a religious nature (unlike the Catholic church, which used it to promote their faith). Therefore, it was this very fact that caused artists in the Dutch Republic to invariably turn their attention to alternative subject matter...including the commonplace, everyday "things" surrounding them.

TYPES OF PAINTING (that became popular in the Dutch Republic)

1) Landscapes
 -scenes in which the subject matter was dominated by the surrounding natural world
 -Marine painting emerged as a 'type' of still-life
 -Church painting - scenes of interior sacred spaces

2) Still-lives (specialization was necessary due to increasing demand for these!)
 -flower painting
 -vanitas
 -fowl and other game animals
 -breakfast pieces

3) Portraits of notable individuals
 -merchants
 -commemorative portraits (marriages, of general documentary nature, prestige, etc.)
 -group portraits (cloth merchant's guild, physician's guild, militia companies, etc.)

4) Genre scenes (scenes of everyday life)

side note 1: Many of these paintings were executed on a rather small scale.

side note 2: And, because major patron behind the artists was no longer the church, a very interesting phenomenon emerged - the increasing importance of the middle class patron and art collector.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Dutch Republic / United Netherlands - notable artists

• Rembrandt
• Frans Hals
• Judith Leyster

Flemish Art (in the South) - notable artists

• Peter Paul Rubens (traveled extensively - a pan-European art)
• Anthony Van Dyck (born in Antwerp, but traveled to Genoa and London)

Baroque Art of the 17th Century

There are 2 trends that dominate Baroque painting - Naturalism and Classicism.

Naturalist painters, such as Caravaggio and Gentileschi, painted with an expressive sense of movement. They employed descriptive and evocative use of color and favored the strong off-stage light and shadow effects that imbued their figures with great drama. Inspiration for this school of painting stemmed from the Venetian Renaissance artists, such as Titian.

Titian >>> Caravaggio >>> Rubens >>> his followers

Classicist painters, such as Carracci and Reni, downplayed the wild emotions and colors favored by the naturalists, inspired by artists who favored classicizing subjects - like Raphael. The art of Nicholas Poussin exemplified this school of Baroque painting, which was dominant throughout France throughout the entire 17th Century.

Raphael >>> Carracci >>> Poussin >>> his followers


---------------------------------------------------------------


Baroque sculpture
The major sculptural influence for sculptors of this time was Hellenistic sculpture.

---------------------------------------------------------------


Flemish Baroque

Sir Peter Paul Rubens

Peter Paul Rubens: Descent from the Cross

Peter Paul Rubens: Arrival of Marie d'Medici

Peter Paul Rubens: Effects of War
---------------------------------------------------------------
French Baroque

Nicholas Poussin

Nicholas Poussin: Self-portrait
 
---------------------------------------------------------------

Georges de Latour

Georges de Latour: Adoration of the Shepherds
Georges de Latour: Penitent Magdalene
Penitent Magdalene (detail)







---------------------------------------------------------------


Spanish Baroque

Francisco de Zurbarán

Francisco de Zurbarán: Saint Serapion
---------------------------------------------------------------

Diego Velázquez

Diego Velazquez: Water Carrier of Seville

Diego Velazquez: King Philip IV of Spain (aka Fraga Philip)
Diego Velazquez: Las Meninas (aka Maids of Honor)
---------------------------------------------------------------

Italian Baroque

Caravaggio
Caravaggio: Entombment

Caravaggio: Conversion of Saint Paul

Caravaggio: The Calling of Saint Matthew

---------------------------------------------------------------

Gian Lorenzo Bernini

-We have a die-hard biography on Bernini - written by a friend after Bernini died.

-He was an extremely religious artist.

-He lived his religion
    a) attended mass every single day
    b) held learning sessions on theology (felt artists should be learned)

-Extremely humble; looked upon himself as being nothing more than a vessel through which God worked. Therefore, his art is a tool for God.

-In 1625, a dramatic change occurs in his art. Works prior to this were secular in nature (sometimes erotic), whereas after this date, almost all of his works were of religious theme.

-He was literally raised by the Catholic church (not an orphan). His father was a sculptor.

-At age 8 or 9, he began creating masterpieces. So, he was taken in by the papacy so he could create beautiful works for the church - for the glory of God.

-Unlike Michelangelo, Bernini was treated very well. Bernini demanded respect and received it.

-He deported himself in a manner that made people respect him.
When asked to critique fellow artists’ work that otherwise lacked skill, he would say, “Truly, the work speaks for itself.” This ambiguous statement represents Bernini’s diplomacy when dealing with others.

-Great work ethic! He would work for seven straight hours carving marble. He would work himself up, into a frenzy. He would have two assistants - one on each side of him - who would ensure Bernini would not fall over.

Q: But, why would the church snatch him at such a young age and provide him with these amenities?
A: To mold him into another Michelangelo… who would work for the church alone.

Bernini was not a man, but a “human dynamo”!

-Over 150 paintings to his hand (he considered painting to be a mere “diversion”)

-He was also a brilliant architect (see the welcoming “arms” in St. Peter’s Piazza)

-The popes really admired him (unlike Julius II’s opinion of Michelangelo)

*The most multi-talented and well-rounded artist to this day (yes, more than Michelangelo)!
*Personal opinion? Yes; biased? Maybe; Would others agree? Most certainly!
*He could do ANYTHING!



Map of Vatican City
The Rome that we see today in Vatican City is essentially the Rome that Bernini left it. He literally defined the area in his time so well that there has been little, if any reason to change it in the past 400 years!

BALDACCHINO, Saint Peter’s (interior)

Bernini’s first commission, calling for a great bronze baldacchino to be placed under the great dome of St. Peter’s

Completed between 1624-1633

Height: 100 feet tall (approximately 8 stories)

Derived from “baldacco” - Italian word meaning “silk from Baghdad” (such as for a cloth canopy)

Marks the high altar of St. Peter.

The 4 columns create visual frame for elaborate sculpture representing the throne of St. Peter (the Cathedra Petri).

Each column was made from 5 cast-bronze segments (taken from wooden models). Bernini did much of the casting, chasing, etc. himself, but wisely contracted the remainder of such industrial tasks associated with the lost-wax casting process.

Four angels grace the upper corners of the canopy.

Four serpentine brackets converge at the apex, supporting and elevating the orb and the cross (both the orb and cross are symbols of Christianity’s triumph, from time of Constantine).

The image of the bees found on this structure refer to Urban VIII’s family name, Barbarini.

Bridging the past with present: the Old St. Peter’s also contained an ancient baldacchino that was placed in the same location.

A synthesis of materials and textures. Materials of brass and wood are present, but bronze is the predominant medium for this work. So much bronze was required to construct this work that Pope Urban VIII ordered workers to secure and dismantle the portico of the Pantheon -- using the bronze from a pagan structure to serve the needs of the Roman Catholic Church.

Themes of triumph and grandeur - present here, as they are in most every aspect of the rebuilding of Saint Peter’s complex.

Bernini: Baldacchino (St. Peter's)
1624-1633

SAINT PETER'S - Facade, Piazza, Arms

The facade of St. Peter's was designed by Moderno. However, the large piazza that exists before it was the work of Bernini. He received a commission to design such a space in the papacy's extensive efforts to rebuild the "new" Saint Peter's church complex. The old St. Peters contained a large atrium to its fore, but this piazza was a project that extended far beyond a mere replacement of such a structure.

There were 2 preexisting structures that Bernini had to factor into his design:
1) ancient Egyptian obelisk (moved by Pope Sixtus V in 1585; symbol of Christianity's triumph in Rome)
2) a fountain designed by Maderno

These structures were used as key points in the oval "arms", their placement counteracting the strong vertical thrust from the obelisk to the facade of St. Peter's.

The 2 arms designed by Bernini are essentially colonnades, each consisting of 4 rows of large Tuscan columns. Each colonnade connects to Moderno's facade and extends from the building along a slight inward angle. An abrupt corner interrupts this straight line, as each arm swells outward, eventually coursing inward. The arms do not meet; rather, each of them terminate in a form that appears like a classical temple facade.

The open space that exists between the caps of these 2 arms serve as the entrance into the piazza. The center of the oval shape that is created between the arching arms is punctuated by the obelisk. The openness of this space allows for one to physically enter the site, but there is great symbolic significance implied by the design as well. The arms serve to welcome and embrace the passersby, creating a sense of hospitality and security. Also, the shape of the colonnade is that of a key-hole. The keyhole implied passage and refers to St. Peter's role of possessor of the keys to the Kingdom.


Bernini: Colonnade or "Arms"
 (Saint Peter's Square, Rome)
 Bernini's DAVID

-Took seven months to complete this.
-Done for Barbarini family
-Quote form a contemporary - “he devoured the marble”

1) Movement - he paid special attention to the movement of hair.
Bernini’s models would be constantly moving in his studio. His figures actually look alive!

Bernini chose to represent David in combat, in motion - the act of hurling a stone at the giant Goliath. This is the split-second in David’s action that represents the greatest amount of energy (the apex).

Analysis of motion: Discus Thrower
(Myron) vs. David (Bernini)
Recall Myron’s Discus Thrower, whose action was frozen at the apex of motion. Myron’s figure possessed the highest degree of potential / stored energy for such an action. The human form was captured at the moment it reached the fullest extension, twist in the “wind-up”, the very moment prior to the springing action that would ensue as the body untwisted and sent the discus hurling into the air beyond the figure.

Here, Bernini’s David is dynamic… He has already begun the action of untwisting, uncoiling, and there is no stopping the momentum that is being generated. David is intent on the task he has set before him - both physically and emotionally.

2) Emotion: Expression on face (fearsome set of lips; intensity of eyes)

3) Self-portrait (Bernini likes to include his likeness, similar to Michelangelo)

4) Finished work (unlike many of Michelangelo’s sculptures); he would never think of not finishing something.

5) Figures placed in niche (against wall) - one point of view (as were Michelangelo’s)

6) Pieced together; Bernini pieces his figures together (Michelangelo - monolithic)

7) Incredible sense of texture


8) Viewer participation:
We are Goliath; we are part of this work, the participants. When we enter the room containing David, our gazes meet and therefore complete the work of art. A similar concept found in Hellenistic sculpture.

In this respect, the work is not self-sufficient (in the sense of Renaissance art). The pose and attitude direct attention beyond it to the unseen Goliath.

Side note: Bernini helped restore Hellenistic sculpture for the popes - the influence is therefore quite easily understood.

Bernini: David
1623

ECSTASY OF SAINT TERESA
Bernini: Interior of the Cornaro Chapel
Santa Maria della Vittoria (Rome, Italy)
-This work quintessentially embodies the spirit of the Baroque style!

-A sculptural interpretation of St. Theresa's diary in which she tells of her visions of God, many involving an angel descending with an angel descending with an arrow and repeatedly plunging it into her.

-Stage-like setting; patrons (members of the Cornaro family) sitting in theater boxes looking on and commenting.

-Natural light redirected onto the sculpture from a window hidden above the work.

-Marble handled in a tactile way: skin = high gloss, feathers of angel rougher, animated / fluid drapery, rougher-handled clouds.

Bernini: Ecstacy of Saint Theresa
1645-1652
Interior of the Cornaro Chapel
 Santa Maria della Vittoria (Rome, Italy)
---------------------------------------------------------------

Artemisia Gentileschi

-Caravaggio's influence (light and shadow, gory details)
-Stage-like w/ intense light and shadow = high drama (emotional)
-Face of Judith is a self-portrait (identifying herself w/ OT heroines)
-Gentileschi specialized in painted images of women triumphing over men (she was a victim of rape, an event that went to trial).

Gentileschi: Self-portrait (aka Allegory of Painting)


Gentileschi: Judith Slaying Holofernes

Gentileschi: Suzanna and the Elders